You have heard about it ... intestinal foul rumblings that some of the Chinese gymnasts were underaged; chiefly, that the gymnast He Kexin, who supposedly deprived Nastia Liukin of one of her gold medals in a byzantine tiebreaker, was only 14 and thus should relinquish her medal.
You know I'm beginning to think that the classiest thing Nastia Liukin could do is head-off the drama-mamas at the pass and publicly refuse to accept any gold medals gained from the possibility that her Chinese counterpart might be underage.
1) In the spirit of true sportsmanship, the medals don't matter anyway, do they? It would be the ultimate American thing to do.
2) Everyone agreed that this is the new scoring system and ties can no longer both get gold medals. If they both had received gold medals, there wouldn't be so much as a whisper about all of this underage business.
3) If everyone was so concerned about underaged contestants, they should have withdrawn their participation in the competition to begin with. But nobody did that, did they?
4) The media is bored and is just looking for something to do. Refusing additional medals would encourage them to focus on, oh, I dunno, THE ELECTION, IRAQ, OSSETIA, BREAST CANCER, you name it.
5) "Hey! Hey! The Chinese gymnast already broke the rules because she was too young, so your whole arguement is bogus!" you say. Oh really? The Chinese gymnast He Kexin did not have a choice whether or not to compete. It wasn't up to her. She should not be punished. She was damn good and earned her medal. What is accomplished here?
6) If He Kexin IS proven too young, accepting a forfeited gold medal tastes and smells like sour Chardonnay grapes; no, something worse ... something ... corrupted. Because in the end, Nastia was beat fair and square according to the agreed upon scoring rules, and now no additional gold medal to add to the glistening pile would erase the added humiliation of being beaten by a fourteen year old.
The best thing to say is: "Here's to London and a rematch in 2012!"